📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ npx skills@latest add mattpocock/skills --skill=<name>
|
||||
- **[claude-handoff](./claude-handoff/SKILL.md)**: Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately, seeded with a handoff summary via `claude --bg`. User-invoked.
|
||||
- **[setup-ts-deep-modules](./setup-ts-deep-modules/SKILL.md)**: Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module: implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files, tests exercising it through those. User-invoked.
|
||||
- **[implement-spec](./implement-spec/SKILL.md)**: Implement a whole spec on one branch. Works the tickets as a task graph rather than a list, running implementer subagents across the ready frontier for maximum concurrency, and lands the result as a single PR. User-invoked.
|
||||
- **[retro](./retro/SKILL.md)**: Suggest improvements to the coding agent's environment (steering files, coding standards, automated checks, tooling) after a session. STUB: design notes only, not functional yet. User-invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: retro
|
||||
description: "Conduct a retrospective on a coding session."
|
||||
disable-model-invocation: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The user has asked for a **retrospective**. You are suggesting improvements to the coding agent's **environment** to improve future runs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call the Skill tool with `writing-for-agents` for the writing style guide.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Read the primary sources for the session the user specifies. This may mean searching through session logs on this machine. If the user doesn't specify a session, default to the current one.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Look for candidates for improvement in these categories.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Navigation**: how easy was it for the agent to find the right files? Are there hidden dependencies between files? Would a **navigation pointer** make it easier? _Use when_ the session took a long time to find a piece of information.
|
||||
- **Automated checks**: are there automated checks that could catch errors the agent made? Linting, typing, tests, filesystem linters? _Use when_ the agent made a mistake that could have been caught by an automated check.
|
||||
- **Coding standards**: should the **reviewer agent** be given a new rule to enforce? Should an existing rule be removed or clarified? _Use when_ the reviewer agent failed to catch a mistake.
|
||||
- **Global AGENTS.md**: are there any steering instructions that should be moved to coding standards (or automated checks) instead? _Use when_ the AGENTS.md file is particularly large - in the repo OR the user's global scope.
|
||||
- **Tool economy**: did the agent make expensive tool calls that could be streamlined? Is there any custom tooling (CLI's, MCP's) that is particularly token-inefficient? _Use when_ the agent made an expensive tool call.
|
||||
- **No-ops**: look for instructions in steering files that don't modify the agent's behavior. _Use when_ the steering files are large and unwieldy.
|
||||
- **Information access**: look for opportunities to increase the agent's access to information. Teeing dev server logs, readonly access to third-party services. _Use when_ a crucial piece of information was not available to the agent.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Present these candidates to the user, in order of severity.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation vs Review
|
||||
|
||||
Remember that all work goes through two stages: implementation and review. The implementation agent has the most **context pressure**. They are responsible for exploration, writing code, and debugging failures.
|
||||
|
||||
The review agent has the least context pressure - it receives a diff, so no exploration needed. It often does not need to write code or debug.
|
||||
|
||||
This means that the review agent should be responsible for imposing coding standards, not the implementation agent.
|
||||
|
||||
### Files
|
||||
|
||||
You have access to several files in the repo:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CLAUDE.md`/`AGENTS.md`: these files are pushed to the context window of any agent working in this repo. They should be used incredibly sparingly, usually only for **navigation pointers** to other files.
|
||||
- `CODING_STANDARDS.md`: this file is read during review, not implementation. Add **navigation pointers** to docs folders if the standards file gets more than 1,000 lines long.
|
||||
- Docs: use docs as references files, pointed to by other files. Look for existing docs before writing new ones.
|
||||
- Skills: use skills for docs (since their description goes into the agent's context window), or for user-invoked commands. Follow the advice in the `writing-for-agents` skill.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
||||
interface:
|
||||
display_name: "Retro"
|
||||
short_description: "Conduct a retrospective on a coding session."
|
||||
policy:
|
||||
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user