From 58b1205703e48f177931034620043e9970fb4640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "ci[bot]" <ci-bot@local>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:04:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] :package: deps(thirdparty): add karpathy guidelines snapshot

---
 andrej-karpathy-skills/SOURCE.md              |  8 ++
 .../skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md       | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 andrej-karpathy-skills/SOURCE.md
 create mode 100644 andrej-karpathy-skills/skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md

diff --git a/andrej-karpathy-skills/SOURCE.md b/andrej-karpathy-skills/SOURCE.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5041c6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/andrej-karpathy-skills/SOURCE.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# Source
+
+- Repo: https://github.com/forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills
+- Ref: 2c606141936f1eeef17fa3043a72095b4765b9c2
+- Remove-Paths:
+- Snapshot: 2026-04-22
+- Sync-Mode: copy_skill_dirs
+- Notes: initial vendored snapshot for later playbook sync wiring
diff --git a/andrej-karpathy-skills/skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md b/andrej-karpathy-skills/skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9a1e913
--- /dev/null
+++ b/andrej-karpathy-skills/skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+name: karpathy-guidelines
+description: Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
+license: MIT
+---
+
+# Karpathy Guidelines
+
+Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from [Andrej Karpathy's observations](https://x.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876) on LLM coding pitfalls.
+
+**Tradeoff:** These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
+
+## 1. Think Before Coding
+
+**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
+
+Before implementing:
+
+- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
+- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
+- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
+- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
+
+## 2. Simplicity First
+
+**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
+
+- No features beyond what was asked.
+- No abstractions for single-use code.
+- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
+- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
+
+If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
+
+Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
+
+## 3. Surgical Changes
+
+**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
+
+When editing existing code:
+
+- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
+- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
+- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
+- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
+
+When your changes create orphans:
+
+- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
+- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
+
+The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
+
+## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
+
+**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
+
+Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
+
+- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
+- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
+- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
+
+For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
+
+```
+1. [Step] → verify: [check]
+2. [Step] → verify: [check]
+3. [Step] → verify: [check]
+```
+
+Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.