📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots

This commit is contained in:
ci[bot]
2026-08-24 09:30:03 +08:00
parent 14e7209e78
commit 5d88510274
153 changed files with 3428 additions and 1203 deletions
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
---
name: writing-fragments
description: Writing, explore mine raw fragments, no structure yet.
description: "Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet."
disable-model-invocation: true
---
<what-to-do>
This is pure **explore**: widen the space of what could be written without committing to structure — committing is _exploit_, a separate skill's job. Run a grilling session that produces fragments, interviewing the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Imposing phases, outlines, or article structure is out of scope here.
This is pure **explore**: widen the space of what could be written without committing to structure. Committing is _exploit_, a separate skill's job. Run a grilling session that produces fragments, interviewing the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Imposing phases, outlines, or article structure is out of scope here.
As fragments emerge from either side of the conversation, append them to a single markdown file.
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ If the user did not pass a path, ask once where to save the document, then remem
Capture fragments from the very first thing the user says, including the initial prompt.
On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else no metadata, no TOC, no date.
On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else: no metadata, no TOC, no date.
</what-to-do>
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change l
## What is a fragment
A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be _readable by the author_ the author can tell what it means but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?"
A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be _readable by the author_ (the author can tell what it means), but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?"
Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment:
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment:
- A quote, a piece of dialogue, an overheard line.
- A list of related observations that hang together by feel.
- A complaint, a confession, a punchline.
- A **leading word** a compact metaphor or coinage the whole piece can hang on (one term that names the idea, the way _tracer bullets_ or _fog of war_ names a whole pattern).
- A **leading word**: a compact metaphor or coinage the whole piece can hang on (one term that names the idea, the way _tracer bullets_ or _fog of war_ names a whole pattern).
Of these, the leading word is the most valuable fragment to land. It is load-bearing: name the right one in explore and it shapes the structure, the transitions, and the title later paying dividends through the entire exploit phase. When the conversation circles a recurring idea, push to coin a word for it.
Of these, the leading word is the most valuable fragment to land. It is load-bearing: name the right one in explore and it shapes the structure, the transitions, and the title later, paying dividends through the entire exploit phase. When the conversation circles a recurring idea, push to coin a word for it.
The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later get mined for raw material. Fragments are noticings.
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later ge
A first fragment lives here.
It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes whatever
It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes: whatever
shape the fragment naturally takes.
---
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Fragments are separated by a horizontal rule (`\n---\n`). No headings inside the
Append silently. Don't ask permission for each fragment. Mention what you added in passing ("adding that"), but don't interrupt the conversation with save dialogs.
Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place).
Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns, so preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place).
The user can say "cut the last one", "rewrite that one sharper", "merge those two" at any time. Treat those as first-class instructions.