📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
|
||||
# Code Tool Error Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
The most common failure modes for `@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode`, with exact error strings, root causes, and fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 1: `"Cannot assign to read only property 'name' of object: Error: No execution data available"`
|
||||
|
||||
**Full message (wrapped by n8n):**
|
||||
> There was an error: "Cannot assign to read only property 'name' of object 'Error: No execution data available'"
|
||||
|
||||
**Cause**: Calling `$fromAI()` inside the Code Tool sandbox. `$fromAI()` is a helper intended for *other* tool-enabled nodes (HTTP Request Tool, SendGrid Tool, `toolWorkflow`) where AI-supplied values flow through workflow execution data. The Code Tool sandbox has no execution data — it receives input directly via `query`. The helper throws, n8n tries to annotate the error's `name` property, and that assignment fails because the error object is frozen.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix**: remove `$fromAI()`. Read from `query` (or define an input schema, see [INPUT_SCHEMA.md](INPUT_SCHEMA.md)).
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// ❌ Broken
|
||||
const price = $fromAI('price', 'Car price in SEK', 'number');
|
||||
|
||||
// ✅ Unstructured — parse a JSON string
|
||||
const params = JSON.parse(query);
|
||||
const price = Number(params.price);
|
||||
|
||||
// ✅ Structured — with specifyInputSchema: true
|
||||
const { price } = query;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 2: `"Wrong output type returned"`
|
||||
|
||||
**Cause**: You returned the workflow item format (`[{json: {...}}]`) from the Code Tool. That format is for regular Code **nodes**; tools follow the LangChain contract and must return a string.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix**: return a string. For structured output, stringify:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// ❌ Broken
|
||||
return [{ json: { monthly_payment: 5405 } }];
|
||||
|
||||
// ✅ Fixed
|
||||
return JSON.stringify({ monthly_payment: 5405 });
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 3: `"The response property should be a string, but it is an <type>"`
|
||||
|
||||
Where `<type>` is `object`, `undefined`, `function`, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cause**: You returned a bare object, array, or nothing at all.
|
||||
|
||||
| Returned value | Error says | Fix |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `{ result: 42 }` | `...is an object` | `JSON.stringify({ result: 42 })` |
|
||||
| `[1, 2, 3]` | `...is an object` | `JSON.stringify([1, 2, 3])` |
|
||||
| *(no `return`)* | `...is an undefined` | Add a `return` |
|
||||
| `undefined` | `...is an undefined` | Return something |
|
||||
|
||||
**Numbers are fine** — n8n auto-converts them to strings:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
return 42; // ✅ becomes "42"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Booleans are NOT auto-converted** — stringify explicitly:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
return String(someBoolean); // ✅
|
||||
return JSON.stringify(someBoolean); // ✅
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 4: AI never calls the tool
|
||||
|
||||
**Symptom**: the agent answers from its own reasoning and ignores the tool. No tool invocation shows up in the execution trace.
|
||||
|
||||
**Common causes and fixes**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Generic name**. Default names like `Code Tool` or `My Tool` give the LLM no signal.
|
||||
- Fix: rename to verb-y, domain-specific snake_case: `calculate_car_loan`, `search_orders`, `lookup_customer`.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Description doesn't state the trigger**. "Calculates things" is too vague.
|
||||
- Fix: explicitly list the user intents that should invoke the tool. `"Use this whenever the user asks about monthly cost, loan breakdown, or total interest."`
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Tool isn't wired**. The node sits in the canvas but isn't connected to the AI Agent's `ai_tool` input.
|
||||
- Fix: connect it. Check the workflow JSON `connections` block has `"<tool_name>": { "ai_tool": [[{ "node": "AI Agent", "type": "ai_tool", "index": 0 }]] }`.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Name violates `[A-Za-z0-9_]+`**. Spaces, hyphens, and emoji in the tool name cause silent skip on v1.1+.
|
||||
- Fix: rename to `snake_case_only`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 5: LLM sends malformed `query`
|
||||
|
||||
**Symptom**: your `JSON.parse(query)` throws, or fields come through as wrong types.
|
||||
|
||||
**Causes**:
|
||||
- You're in unstructured mode and the description is ambiguous, so the LLM invents a format.
|
||||
- You asked for a JSON string but the LLM sent a natural-language sentence.
|
||||
- Numeric fields arrive as strings because the LLM serialized them that way.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fixes**, in order of preference:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Switch to structured mode**. Set `specifyInputSchema: true` and define fields. The LLM now gets a typed schema and n8n validates before your code runs.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Give a concrete example in the description**. LLMs imitate examples well:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Call with a single JSON string. Example:
|
||||
{"price":439900,"down_payment":87980,"interest_rate":6.95}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Coerce defensively**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const params = JSON.parse(query);
|
||||
const price = Number(params.price);
|
||||
if (!isFinite(price)) throw new Error('price must be numeric');
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 6: `"$helpers is not defined"` / `"$input is not defined"`
|
||||
|
||||
**Cause**: you assumed the Code Tool sandbox exposes the same helpers as the Code node. It doesn't.
|
||||
|
||||
**Unavailable in Code Tool**:
|
||||
- `$input`, `$json`, `$binary`
|
||||
- `$node["OtherNode"]`
|
||||
- `$helpers.httpRequest()`
|
||||
- `$jmespath()`
|
||||
- `this.getContext(...)`, `$getWorkflowStaticData(...)`
|
||||
- `$fromAI()`
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix**:
|
||||
- Pure computation? Stay in Code Tool, use plain JS.
|
||||
- Need HTTP? Move to **HTTP Request Tool** (with `$fromAI()` in URL/body).
|
||||
- Need other-node data or credentials? Move to **Call Sub-workflow Tool (`toolWorkflow`)** — its sub-workflow has a full Code node sandbox.
|
||||
- Need state across calls? Not possible in Code Tool. Use a sub-workflow that reads/writes a Data Table, Redis, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error 7: Python-specific — `"name 'query' is not defined"`
|
||||
|
||||
**Cause**: in Python, the input variable is `_query` (underscore prefix), not `query`.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# ❌ Broken
|
||||
result = process(query)
|
||||
|
||||
# ✅ Fixed
|
||||
result = process(_query)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Prevention Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before saving a Code Tool:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Tool **name** is snake_case, descriptive, and unique
|
||||
- [ ] **Description** tells the LLM when to call it, with an example if unstructured
|
||||
- [ ] **No `$fromAI()`** in the code body
|
||||
- [ ] **No `$input`, `$json`, `$helpers`** — not in this sandbox
|
||||
- [ ] Input read from `query` (JS) or `_query` (Python)
|
||||
- [ ] All code paths `return` a string (or a number that auto-converts)
|
||||
- [ ] If returning structured data, wrapped in `JSON.stringify(...)`
|
||||
- [ ] Wired to an AI Agent via `ai_tool` connection
|
||||
- [ ] For multi-field input: either example JSON in description, or `specifyInputSchema: true`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Debugging tips
|
||||
|
||||
- **Use the Execution view**, not just the test output. The agent's tool invocation and raw input/output are visible there — you can see exactly what `query` the LLM sent.
|
||||
- **Log inside the tool** by including fields in the returned JSON:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
return JSON.stringify({ received_query: query, result: /* ... */ });
|
||||
```
|
||||
The LLM sees the echo, and you can spot malformed input.
|
||||
- **Test the tool without the LLM** by temporarily turning the tool node into a standalone Code node with hard-coded `query`, running it manually, then swapping back.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
|
||||
# Input Schema for Code Tool (Structured Mode)
|
||||
|
||||
How to turn `@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode` into a **DynamicStructuredTool** so the LLM passes typed arguments instead of a free-form string.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why use a schema?
|
||||
|
||||
Without a schema, the Code Tool is a LangChain `DynamicTool`:
|
||||
- LLM sees: "one string argument called query"
|
||||
- You must parse whatever the LLM sends
|
||||
- Typos, missing fields, wrong types are your problem at runtime
|
||||
|
||||
With a schema, the Code Tool becomes a `DynamicStructuredTool`:
|
||||
- LLM sees: a typed object with named fields and descriptions
|
||||
- Runtime rejects invalid calls before your code runs
|
||||
- Numeric fields stay numeric (no more `Number(params.price)` for every field)
|
||||
- Tool calls are more reliable — most modern LLMs handle structured tools better than "here's a JSON string please"
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost**: a little config to define the schema, and the node must be on a version that supports it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Enabling the schema
|
||||
|
||||
Set `specifyInputSchema: true` on the `toolCode` parameters. Two schema-definition styles:
|
||||
|
||||
### Style A: `fromJson` — paste a representative example (v≥1.3, recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
The easiest. Give n8n an example JSON, and it infers the schema for you.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"parameters": {
|
||||
"name": "calculate_car_loan",
|
||||
"description": "Computes monthly car-loan payment using an annuity formula with optional balloon.",
|
||||
"language": "javaScript",
|
||||
"specifyInputSchema": true,
|
||||
"schemaType": "fromJson",
|
||||
"jsonSchemaExample": "{\n \"price\": 439900,\n \"down_payment\": 87980,\n \"interest_rate\": 6.95,\n \"months\": 36,\n \"residual_percent\": 50,\n \"setup_fee\": 695,\n \"monthly_admin_fee\": 59\n}",
|
||||
"jsCode": "// query is now a validated OBJECT, not a string\nconst { price, down_payment, interest_rate, months, residual_percent, setup_fee = 0, monthly_admin_fee = 0 } = query;\n\nconst principal = price - down_payment;\nconst residual = price * (residual_percent / 100);\nconst r = interest_rate / 100 / 12;\nconst growth = Math.pow(1 + r, months);\nconst base = r === 0\n ? (principal - residual) / months\n : (principal - residual / growth) * r / (1 - 1 / growth);\nconst monthly_payment = base + monthly_admin_fee;\n\nreturn JSON.stringify({\n monthly_payment_sek: Math.round(monthly_payment),\n loan_amount: Math.round(principal)\n});"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode",
|
||||
"typeVersion": 1.3,
|
||||
"name": "calculate_car_loan"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**How it works**: n8n looks at the example, infers `{price: number, down_payment: number, ...}`, and generates a JSON Schema. The LLM sees that schema and passes a validated object.
|
||||
|
||||
### Style B: `manual` — write the JSON Schema yourself
|
||||
|
||||
Use when you need descriptions per field, enums, min/max constraints, or optional fields.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"parameters": {
|
||||
"name": "calculate_car_loan",
|
||||
"description": "Computes monthly car-loan payment.",
|
||||
"language": "javaScript",
|
||||
"specifyInputSchema": true,
|
||||
"schemaType": "manual",
|
||||
"inputSchema": "{\n \"type\": \"object\",\n \"required\": [\"price\", \"down_payment\", \"interest_rate\", \"months\", \"residual_percent\"],\n \"properties\": {\n \"price\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"description\": \"Car price in SEK\" },\n \"down_payment\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"description\": \"Down payment in SEK\" },\n \"interest_rate\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"description\": \"Annual nominal rate in percent, e.g. 6.95\" },\n \"months\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 1, \"description\": \"Loan term in months\" },\n \"residual_percent\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"minimum\": 0, \"maximum\": 99, \"description\": \"Balloon as % of price\" },\n \"setup_fee\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"default\": 0 },\n \"monthly_admin_fee\": { \"type\": \"number\", \"default\": 0 }\n }\n}",
|
||||
"jsCode": "const { price, down_payment, interest_rate, months, residual_percent, setup_fee = 0, monthly_admin_fee = 0 } = query;\n// ... same computation as above ...\nreturn JSON.stringify({ monthly_payment_sek: /*...*/ });"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode",
|
||||
"typeVersion": 1.3,
|
||||
"name": "calculate_car_loan"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When `manual` is worth it**:
|
||||
- You want per-field `description` strings (the LLM reads these)
|
||||
- You need `enum` values (e.g. currency: `["SEK", "EUR", "USD"]`)
|
||||
- You need numeric constraints (`minimum`, `maximum`)
|
||||
- You want to mark fields as optional cleanly
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## How `query` behaves with a schema
|
||||
|
||||
Source of truth from the ToolCode sandbox:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
const sandbox = new JsTaskRunnerSandbox(workflowMode, ctx, undefined, { query });
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The sandbox always receives `{ query }`. The difference is what `query` holds:
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Type of `query` | How to use |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| No schema | `string` | `JSON.parse(query)` if you want structure |
|
||||
| With schema | `object` (validated) | Destructure: `const { price, months } = query;` |
|
||||
|
||||
In Python, the same applies — `_query` is a string without schema, a dict with schema.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Schema version compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
- `specifyInputSchema` and `schemaType: "manual"` with `inputSchema`: available in v1.2
|
||||
- `schemaType: "fromJson"` with `jsonSchemaExample`: requires v≥1.3
|
||||
|
||||
Set `typeVersion: 1.3` on the node if you want `fromJson`. Older installs should use `manual`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Picking a pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Does your tool need more than one input field?
|
||||
├─ No (just a URL, question, text blob)
|
||||
│ └─ Unstructured — skip the schema
|
||||
├─ Yes, and fields are all typed (numbers, bools, enums)
|
||||
│ └─ Structured with fromJson (easiest)
|
||||
├─ Yes, and you need constraints or rich descriptions
|
||||
│ └─ Structured with manual
|
||||
└─ Yes, and fields are complex / reusable across agents
|
||||
└─ Use toolWorkflow (sub-workflow tool) instead of toolCode
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Gotcha: schema must be valid JSON
|
||||
|
||||
`jsonSchemaExample` and `inputSchema` are **strings containing JSON**, not objects. Watch the escaping when you paste them into workflow JSON. If the node won't save or the LLM doesn't see the fields, validate the JSON separately first.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Gotcha: schema changes don't retroactively fix old agent runs
|
||||
|
||||
If an agent was already started with an unstructured tool and you flip it to structured, the agent's system prompt may still reflect the old contract until it's reloaded. Force a re-run / re-open the agent node after changing schema settings.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user