csh/playbook
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ci[bot]
2026-07-30 01:23:25 +00:00
parent 0c634043e3
commit a2904b069a
3368 changed files with 12954 additions and 9475 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/antigravity-maintainer-batch-release/SKILL.md
+1
View File
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ Before changing anything:
- Run `npm run validate`, `npm run validate:references`, `npm run security:docs`, changed-skill evidence, and the relevant tests.
- Treat the entire tracked `skills/<skill-id>/**` subtree as skill content. Inspect semantics, safety, provenance, declared risk, limitations, and every bundled file directly, including nested examples, scripts, lockfiles, references, and assets. Never reduce evidence or review to `SKILL.md` or a fixed support-directory allowlist.
- Require changed-skill evidence to cover every Git record in each changed canonical skill subtree. Require the `skill-review` workflow for changes under `skills/**` or `plugins/**/skills/**`; its reusable result must be keyed by the complete nearest skill-directory fingerprint on the exact current head SHA.
- Keep canonical skill ownership lookup proportional to changed-path depth, not total registry size, and preserve the five-minute trusted evaluator budget so repository-wide evidence completes without weakening fail-closed checks. Parse a legacy executable-mode canonical `SKILL.md` only as private, non-executable snapshot data; keep it reported as unsafe and never materialize symlinks, gitlinks, or other executable files.
- `review` means Tessl semantic review actually ran or a valid identical-content result was reused.
- `manual-review-required` means Tessl credentials or credits were unavailable, or Tessl did not produce a passing result. Perform the maintainer semantic review and attest with `--reviewed-head <full-40-character-sha>`.
- Any non-passing Tessl outcome produces `manual-review-required`; complete the semantic review and bind the judgment to the exact head instead of treating a heuristic score as merge authority.