📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
This commit is contained in:
+6
-14
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before m
|
||||
|
||||
# Requesting Code Review
|
||||
|
||||
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
|
||||
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core principle:** Review early, review often.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,20 +72,12 @@ You: [Fix progress indicators]
|
||||
[Continue to Task 3]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Workflows
|
||||
## Common Rationalizations
|
||||
|
||||
**Subagent-Driven Development:**
|
||||
- Review after EACH task
|
||||
- Catch issues before they compound
|
||||
- Fix before moving to next task
|
||||
|
||||
**Executing Plans:**
|
||||
- Review after each task or at natural checkpoints
|
||||
- Get feedback, apply, continue
|
||||
|
||||
**Ad-Hoc Development:**
|
||||
- Review before merge
|
||||
- Review when stuck
|
||||
| Excuse | Reality |
|
||||
|--------|---------|
|
||||
| "I'll just review the diff myself instead of dispatching a reviewer" | You're the coordinator — reviewing the diff inline burns the context window you need to keep driving the work. Dispatch a reviewer subagent: the diff and the evaluation live in its context, and only the findings come back to you. |
|
||||
| "The reviewer needs my whole session history to understand the change" | Hand it precisely crafted context, never your session's history. That keeps the reviewer on the work product, not your thought process. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user