# Instruments Trace Analysis Use this reference whenever the user references an Xcode Instruments `.trace` file. A target SwiftUI source file is **optional** — if provided, you can cite specific lines; without one, the trace still surfaces view names, hot symbols, and high-severity events that tell the user where to look. The bundled parser reads five lanes for SwiftUI responsiveness (Time Profiler, Hangs, Animation Hitches, SwiftUI updates, and the SwiftUI cause graph) and exposes three discovery modes (`--list-logs`, `--list-signposts`, `--fanin-for`) plus a `--window` flag so the agent can focus analysis on a precise slice of the trace. ## When to invoke Any of these signals: - Message contains a path ending in `.trace`. - User mentions "hangs", "hitches", "jank", "slow view", or performance issues alongside an Instruments recording. - User asks to focus analysis "after / before / between / during" a log message or signpost. Triggering does **not** require a SwiftUI source file. If one is present you'll ground recommendations in specific lines; if not, base them on the view names and symbols the trace reveals. ## The three CLI modes The scripts live alongside this skill at `scripts/` and need only the Python 3 stdlib + `xctrace` (ships with Xcode at `/usr/bin/xctrace`). ### 1. Full analysis (default) ```bash python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/analyze_trace.py" \ --trace "/path/to/file.trace" \ --top 10 --top-hitches 5 \ [--window START_MS:END_MS] \ --json-only ``` - `--json-only` gives you structured data; omit for JSON + markdown summary; `--markdown-only` is for pasting a digest into the chat. - `--output ` writes `.json` and `.md` instead of stdout. - `--window START_MS:END_MS` (optional) restricts every lane and every correlation to that time slice. - `--run N` selects a specific run when the trace contains more than one recording session. Single-run traces don't need it; multi-run traces require it and will error with the available run numbers if omitted. Use `--list-runs` to dump per-run metadata (template, duration, start/end dates, schemas) before analyzing. ### 2. `--list-logs` — find os_log timestamps ```bash python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/analyze_trace.py" --trace --list-logs \ [--log-subsystem com.myapp.net] \ [--log-category "Network"] \ [--log-type Fault] \ [--log-message-contains "loaded feed"] \ [--log-limit 10] \ [--window START_MS:END_MS] ``` Returns JSON `{ "logs": [...], "count": N }` where each log entry includes `time_ms`, `type`, `subsystem`, `category`, `process`, and the formatted `message` (with args substituted) + raw `format_string`. All filters are AND-combined; `--log-message-contains` is case-insensitive substring match. ### 3. `--list-signposts` — find signpost intervals ```bash python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/analyze_trace.py" --trace --list-signposts \ [--signpost-name-contains "ImageDecode"] \ [--signpost-subsystem com.myapp.feed] \ [--signpost-category "Rendering"] \ [--window START_MS:END_MS] ``` Returns JSON `{ "intervals": [...], "events": [...] }`. Intervals are paired `begin`/`end` signposts with `start_ms`, `end_ms`, `duration_ms`, `name`, `subsystem`, `category`, `process`, `signpost_id`. Single-point events (and any unpaired begins) go into `events`. All filters are AND-combined; `--signpost-name-contains` is case-insensitive substring match. ### 4. `--fanin-for` — who keeps invalidating this view? ```bash python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/analyze_trace.py" --trace \ --fanin-for "TextStyleModifier" \ [--window START_MS:END_MS] \ [--top 10] ``` Returns JSON `{ "matches": [...] }`. Each match names a destination node whose fmt string contains the substring (case-insensitive) and lists its top incoming source nodes ranked by edge count. Use this after the `swiftui` lane names an expensive view and you want to know *why it keeps being invalidated*. For the example above, the top source is `closure #1 in UserDefaultObserver.Target.GraphAttribute.send()` — the canonical signature of an `@AppStorage` / `UserDefaults` feedback storm. ## Composition pattern — scoping to a slice When the user says something like "focus on X", "between A and B", or "during signpost Y", compose the three modes: 1. **Discover** — call `--list-logs` or `--list-signposts` with filters that match the user's description. Pick the right entries. 2. **Build the window** — take `time_ms` (logs) or `start_ms`/`end_ms` (intervals) and form `--window START:END`. 3. **Analyse** — call the default mode with `--window`. Examples: - *"Focus on the section after the log saying 'loaded feed'."* → `--list-logs --log-message-contains "loaded feed"`, take the entry's `time_ms`, set window = `[that_ms, end_of_trace_ms]` (or use the trace `duration_s × 1000`). - *"Between the 'begin-sync' log and the 'done-sync' log."* → Two `--list-logs` calls (or one with a broader filter), pick the two timestamps, set window = `[first, second]`. - *"During the signpost 'ImageDecode'."* → `--list-signposts --signpost-name-contains "ImageDecode"`, pick the interval, set window = `[start_ms, end_ms]`. ## JSON shape ```json { "trace": "...", "xctrace_version": "26.4 (...)", "template": "SwiftUI", "duration_s": 14.83, "schemas_available": [...], "lanes": [ { "lane": "time-profiler", "available": true, "schema_used": "time-profile", "metrics": { "total_samples": N, "total_weight_ms": ms, "processes": [...] }, "top_offenders": [ { "symbol", "weight_ms", "percent", "samples", "thread" } ] }, { "lane": "hangs", "available": true, "schema_used": "potential-hangs", "metrics": { "count", "total_duration_ms", "worst_duration_ms", "severity_buckets": {"lt_250ms","250ms_1s","gt_1s"} }, "top_offenders": [ { "start_ms", "duration_ms", "hang_type", "thread" } ] }, { "lane": "hitches", "available": true, "schema_used": "hitches", "metrics": { "count", "total_hitch_ms", "worst_hitch_ms", "narrative_breakdown": {...}, "system_hitches", "app_hitches" }, "top_offenders": [ { "start_ms", "hitch_duration_ms", "narrative", "is_system" } ] }, { "lane": "swiftui", "available": true, "schemas_used": [...], "metrics": { "total_events", "unique_views", "total_duration_ms", "severity_breakdown": {"Very Low":N,"Moderate":N,"High":N}, "update_type_breakdown": {"View Body Updates":N, ...} }, "top_offenders": [ { "view", "total_ms", "count", "avg_ms" } ], "high_severity_events": [ { "view", "severity", "duration_ms", "category", "update_type", "description" } ] }, { "lane": "swiftui-causes", "available": true, "schema_used": "swiftui-causes", "metrics": { "total_edges", "unique_sources", "unique_destinations", "top_labels": {...} }, "top_sources": [ { "source", "edges", "top_destinations": [...] } ], "top_destinations": [ { "destination", "edges", "top_sources": [...] } ] } ], "correlations": [ { "trigger": { "lane": "hangs"|"hitches", "start_ms", "end_ms", "duration_ms", "hang_type"|"frame_duration_ms" }, "time_profiler_main_thread": { "samples_in_window": N, "samples_on_main": M, "main_running_coverage_pct": 0–100, "hot_symbols": [ { "symbol", "samples", "weight_ms", "percent_of_main" } ] }, "swiftui_overlapping_updates": [ { "view", "duration_ms", "start_ms" } ] } ] } ``` ## Interpretation guide ### `main_running_coverage_pct` is the key diagnostic Time Profiler samples the main thread every ~1ms. For a correlation window of `N` ms, you'd expect ~`N` main-thread running samples if main were fully CPU-bound. Coverage is the ratio of observed main-thread samples to that expectation. - **< 25% coverage** → main thread was **blocked** (I/O, lock, sync XPC, `Task.sleep`, waiting on an actor-isolated call). The `hot_symbols` you do see are the moments main *was* executing — look there for the code that *initiates* the blocking work, not the work itself. Common fix: move to a background executor / `nonisolated` / `Task.detached`. - **≥ 75% coverage** → main was **CPU-bound** the whole time. `hot_symbols` point directly at the expensive work. Common fixes: hoist computation out of view bodies, cache derived values, avoid per-frame allocation, debounce `onChange`. - **25–75%** → mix. Usually computation plus intermittent I/O; show both hot symbols and note that main was partially blocked. ### High-severity SwiftUI events → reference routing When `swiftui.high_severity_events[].description` is one of: | description | Likely cause | Route to | |------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------| | `onChange` | Expensive `.onChange` body | `references/performance-patterns.md`, `references/state-management.md` | | `Gesture` | Heavy gesture handler | `references/performance-patterns.md` | | `Action Callback`| Button/tap handler work | `references/performance-patterns.md` | | `Update` | View body recomputation | `references/view-structure.md`, `references/performance-patterns.md` | | `Creation` | View init cost | `references/view-structure.md` | | `Layout` | GeometryReader churn | `references/layout-best-practices.md` | ### Mapping trace findings to source code If the user gave you a specific file, use it to confirm/cite. If they didn't, the trace itself tells you which views and symbols to look up. 1. **From `swiftui.top_offenders` and `high_severity_events`**, use the `view` string as your search key. If a target file is open, grep it; if not, recommend the user grep their project for that type or the module name. A partial match (prefix / generic stripping) means it's probably a subview. 2. **From `correlations[].time_profiler_main_thread.hot_symbols`**, treat symbols starting with the user's module name (or in Swift free-function form) as candidates. System frames (`swift_`, `dyld`, `objc_`, `CA*`, `CF*`, `NS*`, `__open`, `pthread*`) identify *what* the code was doing but the user-code caller one frame up is typically what to fix — say so and, if you can, suggest searching the project for callers of the equivalent Swift API (e.g. `__open` → `FileHandle` / `Data(contentsOf:)` / `JSONDecoder.decode(from: Data)` sites). 3. **From `hitches[].narrative`**, Apple pre-attributes each hitch. The string `"Potentially expensive app update(s)"` means SwiftUI blamed the app (so user code is in scope); absence of narrative usually means it was a system hitch or below the threshold. 4. **Correlating hitches with SwiftUI updates**: the `swiftui_overlapping_updates` list on each hitch names the views that were actively rendering when the frame dropped. Prioritise those. ### Cause graph: finding *why* updates keep happening The `swiftui` lane tells you *what* is expensive; the `swiftui-causes` lane tells you *why* it keeps being triggered. Each edge is "source node propagated to destination node" in SwiftUI's attribute graph. Signatures to watch for in `top_sources`: - **`closure #1 in UserDefaultObserver.Target.GraphAttribute.send()`** — an `@AppStorage` / `UserDefaults` write is fanning out to every reader. If the destination list contains multiple `@AppStorage .` entries with thousands of edges each, you have a feedback storm. Fix by reading each key once at a high level and passing values down, or wrapping settings in a single `@Observable` so only genuine readers invalidate. Route to `references/state-management.md` and `references/performance-patterns.md`. - **`EnvironmentWriter: …`** with thousands of edges — a modifier (often `.hoverEffect`, custom environment keys) is applied too widely and being re-installed during every layout pass. Route to `references/view-structure.md`. - **`View Creation / Reuse`** as the #1 source — the hierarchy is replacing children rather than mutating in place. Look for ID instability (missing/unstable `.id(…)` on ForEach, type-erased `AnyView` wrappers, conditional structure swaps). Route to `references/list-patterns.md` and `references/view-structure.md`. When a specific view in `swiftui.high_severity_events` keeps showing up, run `--fanin-for ""` to see the ranked list of sources invalidating it. ### Picking targets from a full-trace analysis Prioritise from most actionable to least: 1. **Any `hangs` with `main_running_coverage_pct < 25%`** — these are blocking-I/O smells; nearly always fixable by moving work off-main. 2. **Any `hangs` with `main_running_coverage_pct ≥ 75%`** — CPU-bound main-thread work; fix the top `hot_symbols`. 3. **`swiftui-causes.top_sources` with > ~1k edges** — structural invalidation bugs (feedback storms, over-applied modifiers). These are often cheaper to fix than per-view optimisations and collapse many downstream high-severity updates at once. 4. **`hitches` with `narrative == "Potentially expensive app update(s)"`** and overlapping `swiftui_overlapping_updates` — specific views to restructure. 5. **`swiftui.high_severity_events`** — `onChange`, `Gesture`, or `Action Callback` with `duration_ms > ~16` are frame-dropping handlers. For any that keep firing, run `--fanin-for` to find the source. 6. **`swiftui.top_offenders`** — heaviest views by total body time, even without triggering hitches; candidates for view extraction or memoisation (`equatable`, `@ViewBuilder` extraction). ## Recommended output format for the user After running the parser, structure your response as: 1. **One-line summary** — "Found N hangs, worst Wms; K hitches; J high-severity SwiftUI updates." 2. **Root-cause findings** — per prioritised target (see above), one paragraph with the trace evidence (coverage %, hot symbol, overlapping view) and a citation from `references/…` for the fix pattern. 3. **Plan** — numbered, file-specific edits. Cite line numbers in the user's Swift file when you know them. Don't edit the file unless the user asked for edits.