Squashed 'docs/standards/playbook/' changes from c3f8137..25d895d

25d895d 🐛 fix(gitea_workflow): clean up temp repos after job steps
2bc3b11 🐛 fix(gitea_workflow): clean up temporary repo dirs in workflows
98c3f30 📝 docs(agent_rules): allow plan execution on current branch
16c7230 📝 docs(prompts): define custom verify layering
8efc4dd 🐛 fix(skills): quote commit-message description
bc8498f 🐛 fix(ci): install tomli for gitea tests
55cda3b 🐛 fix(tests): report missing toml parser clearly
c0729c7 🐛 fix(playbook): import Optional for cli compatibility
63e24bf 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
d2f9356 🐛 fix(ci): isolate gitea workflow repos
588b81d 🐛 fix(ci): inline gitea workflow bootstrap
e0b1c3a ♻️ refactor(skills): standardize first-party skill contracts
2c5050d ♻️ refactor(skills): rename repo skills source dir
f049dfb 📦 deps(skills): drop duplicate first-party superpowers skills
234b335  feat(workflow): add superpowers planning and execution state tracking
c1702a6 📝 docs(markdown): format tracked markdown and drop stale templates
2325409 📝 docs(markdown): clarify optional markdownlint usage
214c44e 🔧 chore(markdown): add markdownlint baseline and lint fixes
a22b324 📝 docs(templates): add execution and memory-bank prompt templates
223a797 📝 docs(templates): update README for Claude Code and current features
4ac8672 📝 docs: simplify README + platform-agnostic tools + auto-create local rules
2431c9d 📝 docs: add claude_md config and use cross-platform paths
d64b248 📝 docs: fix README.md inaccuracies and add Claude Code info
c8d6bf2 🐛 fix(playbook): use relative paths in CLAUDE.md when not at project root
6518f0f  feat(playbook): auto-create CLAUDE.md with path discovery
6ec9a45  feat(skills): add skill_link symlink support + platform-agnostic prompt
9f8b6b5 📝 docs: update README and config example for Claude Code support
79cff6c 📝 docs(skills): add Claude Code platform support
452c6f5  feat(playbook): auto-inject AGENTS.md into CLAUDE.md
e1dbf3c 🐛 fix(skills): remove dual-path from commit-message skill
f3a7259 🔧 chore(ci): use prepare_repo.sh in both workflows
da08212 🔧 chore(ci): extract prepare_repo.sh and clean up workflows
7ade85e 🗑️ remove(tsl): drop syntax_book/, data/ source and build script
f94dba0 ♻️ refactor(skills): update playbook.py and tests for thirdparty/ layout
b3df412 ♻️ refactor(skills): separate thirdparty skills into thirdparty/ subdirectory
64950e7 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
a2e3cb0  feat(playbook): add no_backup deploy controls
8609d59 🐛 fix(docs): repair reference catalog source links
956da11 🐛 fix(playbook): publish hidden ci test fixes
3f67754 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
08ca87b 📦 deps(skills): add karpathy thirdparty sync
96b705b 📝 docs(tsl): rebuild canonical syntax and routing manual
3ed5052 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
60108dd 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
da85d4e 🐛 fix(thirdparty): prune nested project snapshots
a2a697e 📦 deps(skills): sync thirdparty skills
9df610a 🐛 fix(thirdparty): exclude duplicated superpowers skills
33dd5bb 🐛 fix(thirdparty): preserve optional manifest fields
91b0ea7 🐛 fix(thirdparty): preserve manifest during snapshot update
2e26f98 🔧 chore(thirdparty): generalize skills sync pipeline
5b9c1e3 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
2f2d34a 📝 docs(readme): normalize subtree command spacing
62db7db 🐛 fix(ci): serialize superpowers update and sync
3463223 🐛 fix(ci): use literal superpowers sync paths
48f6de8 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
4b23529 🔧 chore(ci): merge superpowers update and sync workflow
a56d75b 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
84bcefa 🔧 chore(ci): use ci[bot] commit author name
00a07e5 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
7b84daf 🐛 fix(templates): enforce main loop progress tracking
51373d7 🔧 chore(ci): automate superpowers sync workflow
eaaa39c 🐛 fix(ci): prevent stale superpowers sync from restoring skills block
79755c6 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
836d878 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
8216c9f 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
9439505 🐛 fix(playbook): address reported repo issues

git-subtree-dir: docs/standards/playbook
git-subtree-split: 25d895d8b3f56624ccfe99ad7289e9eb49e0f316
This commit is contained in:
csh
2026-05-24 13:04:14 +08:00
parent 35e6a301aa
commit 3d83740f88
292 changed files with 30774 additions and 218828 deletions
+109
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
---
name: bulk-refactor-workflow
description: Use when renaming symbols, migrating APIs, or applying safe mechanical changes across many files in the repository.
---
# Bulk Refactor Workflow(批量重构 / 大范围修改)
## Overview
Guide repository-wide mechanical edits without losing scope control or damaging
unrelated work. Core principle: enumerate first, transform mechanically, verify
in loops, and keep every batch auditable.
## When to Use
- Rename APIs, symbols, file conventions, or repeated string patterns
- Apply scripted or structural edits across many files
- Migrate callers to a new interface where the change pattern is repeatable
## When Not to Use
- One-off logic changes where no repeatable transformation exists
- Exploratory redesign or feature work that needs new architecture decisions
- Cleanup that is only formatting/lint alignment; use `style-cleanup` directly
## Inputs
- Scope: directories, file types, include/exclude rules
- Transformation: rename, replace, codemod, scripted edit, migration strategy
- Constraints: behavior-preserving vs. compatibility window vs. staged rollout
- Verification commands: smallest useful loop plus final gate
## Procedure
1. **Baseline and bound the scope**
- Record `git status --short`.
- Dirty worktrees are allowed.
- Do not revert unrelated changes.
- Mark the exact target file set before editing.
- Run a baseline verification command so existing failures are not misattributed
to the refactor.
2. **Enumerate every intended hit**
- Search before editing with `rg`, `git grep`, or a structured query.
- Separate real code hits from comments, docs, generated files, and samples.
- Write down exclusions before running the transformation.
3. **Choose the safest mechanical transform**
- Prefer deterministic transforms: codemods, scripts, structured edits, or
narrow search/replace with explicit scope.
- If compatibility matters, use a staged migration: adapt providers first,
migrate callers second, remove compatibility layer last.
4. **Apply in bounded batches**
- First, apply the transformation in bounded batches.
- Verify each batch before widening scope.
- Stop immediately if output differs from the expected hit class.
5. **Verify in loops**
- Run the smallest relevant verification after each batch.
- Re-check the hit list after edits to confirm the intended pattern is gone and
unintended patterns were not introduced.
6. **Finish with targeted cleanup**
- If the mechanical change leaves formatting or lint fallout, Use `style-cleanup` for the final formatting/lint pass.
- Keep that cleanup scoped to the refactor set unless the user approves a wider
pass.
7. **Report**
- Summarize files touched, transform rules used, verification evidence, and any
residual risk.
## Output Contract
- `Scope:` files, directories, and exclusions actually used
- `Transformation:` exact rule or script applied
- `Batches:` how the work was partitioned
- `Verification:` commands, exit status, and what each loop proved
- `Risks:` remaining ambiguous areas, compatibility debt, or deferred cleanup
## Success Criteria
- Every changed file belongs to the declared scope
- The transformation is reproducible and explainable
- Verification passes at both batch level and final gate
- Unrelated work in the repository is preserved
## Failure Handling
- If the hit list is ambiguous, stop and refine scope before editing
- If the transform cannot be expressed mechanically, downgrade to a normal
refactor plan instead of pretending it is safe bulk work
- If verification fails mid-batch, stop, inspect the smallest failing delta, and
correct the transform before continuing
- If compatibility risk is higher than expected, split the migration into staged
commits or phases
## Guardrails
- Never run repository-wide replacement without an explicit hit review
- Never mix unrelated cleanup into the same batch
- Never hide a large-scope behavior change behind the label "mechanical refactor"