Squashed 'docs/standards/playbook/' changes from e504a68..b529012

b529012 ✅ test(tests): avoid hardcoded missing path 07583c8 🐛 fix(tests): make doc link check awk-portable 6244aa3 🔧 chore(ci): relax gitattributes check 31dd0c5 🐛 fix(scripts): require existing project root 15d4d63 🔧 chore(ci): install python3-pip 90c6313 🔧 chore(ci): run tests in a single job d84eff0 🔧 chore(ci): make actions base url configurable 395598d 🔧 chore(ci): fix yaml step names 4ae2733 ✨ feat(sync_standards): auto-detect existing languages e97fb00 ✨ feat(sync_standards): default gitattributes to append da0ef2b ✅ test: add automated tests and ci workflow 99bef30 🎨 style(markdown): format all markdown files with prettier 7e96bc8 ♻️ refactor(tsl): split function.md into 44 modular files 0d6b2a0 📝 docs(readme): add quick decision table and TL;DR for distribution methods 3b2188f 🎨 style(markdown): format markdown files with prettier 41fc43b 📝 docs(tsl): document {Unit.}Type source annotation 3dceaf7 📝 docs(tsl): clarify tsf-only top-level rules and type annotations 3a63829 📝 docs(skills): add create-plan skill f02a707 🐛 fix(scripts): escape markdown backticks in vendor_playbook 064aa92 🐛 fix(scripts): correct bat scripts 4881feb 🔧 chore(gitattributes): enforce crlf for bat files 1fa3e2a 🐛 fix(scripts): escape parentheses in sync_standards output 3958cad 📝 docs(vendor_playbook): mention ci templates 9d059cf ✨ feat(templates): add gitea ci example a52bb24 📝 docs(codex_skills): normalize markdown formatting cc8ad4c 📝 docs(skills): slim commit-message 2a98e15 🐛 fix(skills): quote YAML descriptions 8f78d22 🐛 fix(sync_standards): generate minimal AGENTS.md 5547665 ✨ feat(skills): add commit-message suggestion skill 3fe8bd7 🔧 chore(sync_standards): create AGENTS.md on sync 283d311 ✨ feat(playbook): add syntax book and codex skills tooling 5b97ed5 📝 docs(tsl): clarify syntax references 27e0700 ✨ feat(skills): add pdf/docx/pptx/xlsx wrapper workflows 5551363 ✨ feat(skills): add debugging and bulk refactor workflows 1d4f548 ✨ feat(skills): add built-in workflow skills c0895dd 📝 docs(skills): add anthropics document-skills integration cf9f80d 🔧 chore(playbook): add Claude Code skills guide and align python templates git-subtree-dir: docs/standards/playbook git-subtree-split: b529012c59c5d67c3073884d7b617763647417fd
2026-01-08 15:56:36 +08:00
parent eada742d75
commit ac794a6a70
113 changed files with 254751 additions and 176 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+---
+name: verification-before-completion
+description:
+  "Evidence-based verification before claiming completion. Triggers: verify,
+  verification, run tests, prove, 验证, 跑一下, 确认一下, 自证."
+---
+
+# Verification Before Completion（先验证再宣称完成）
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Any task where correctness matters (bug fixes, refactors, releases)
+- When the environment is complex or assumptions are likely
+
+## Inputs（required）
+
+- What “done” means (acceptance criteria)
+- The smallest verification command(s) that prove it
+- Constraints: cannot run tests? no access? limited environment?
+
+## Procedure（default）
+
+1. **Define Success Signals**
+   - Tests passing, build artifacts produced, commands return 0
+   - Specific output text or file diffs
+
+2. **Run the Smallest Check**
+   - Start narrow (changed module tests) then broaden if needed
+
+3. **Record Evidence**
+   - Capture key output lines, exit codes, and relevant file paths
+
+4. **Handle Gaps**
+   - If verification can’t be run, say why and offer alternatives (manual
+     checklist, static reasoning, targeted logs)
+
+## Output Contract（stable）
+
+- What changed
+- What was verified (exact commands)
+- Evidence (exit codes / key outputs)
+- What was not verified (and why)
+- Next steps (if any)
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- Don’t claim “fixed” without a verification signal
+- Prefer repeatable commands over subjective inspection