Squashed 'docs/standards/playbook/' changes from b529012..a854534

a854534  feat(plan_progress): auto-detect env for blocked plans
0d9a8ec 🐛 fix(playbook): honor no_backup for sync
2d401fa  test(templates): update prompts validation
e23474e 📝 docs(playbook): update prompts and sync notes
60ff3cd 🐛 fix(playbook): sync templates per file
816f036  test(playbook): add sync and vendor coverage
625cabb 📝 docs(memory_bank): reformat templates
2554c87 📝 docs(prompts): refresh prompt templates
6774a9d  feat(plan_progress): track plan status in progress.md
73d5c26 🔧 chore(playbook): split sync_templates into sections
278750e  feat(playbook): add plan progress tracking and rules updates
6efd637 🐛 fix(sync): keep agents block blank lines
ea00d43 🐛 fix(playbook): support toml without tomllib
ab0dd11 📝 docs(playbook): drop docs/plans snapshots
398696c  feat(playbook): merge unified cli
d959f80 🎨 style(docs): format markdown
b4f712a 🗑️ remove(legacy): drop old scripts and tests
0c4cd0e  feat(actions): add install_skills and format_md
3d1582c  feat(sync): add templates and standards actions
49bbfa1  feat(vendor): add playbook snapshot generation
8cfcc25  feat(cli): parse toml config and dispatch actions
05903c3  feat(cli): add toml config and dispatch order
65d216e  test(cli): add basic playbook cli tests
f0bcf54 📝 docs(plans): add unified playbook cli plan
0885309 📝 docs(plans): add unified playbook cli design
3483d8a 🔧 chore(git): ignore .worktrees dir
eb75036 🔧 chore(templates): align agent templates and docs
efb93f1 📝 docs(playbook): drop todo/confirm mentions
4a85306 🗑️ remove(workflow): drop todo/confirm artifacts
9c5ee9f 🎨 style(markdown): format docs with prettier
5a2925f 🐛 fix(scripts): repair windows script parsing
26a35e0  test(ci): update required skills list
8df3883 🐛 fix(test): skip external root doc links
b067fc1 📦 deps(skills): sync superpowers
c03cda0 🔧 chore(ci): sync from origin main
55e05cb 🔧 chore(ci): use superpowers sync script
73c97f3 🔧 chore(ci): centralize superpowers sync
945704f 🔧 chore(ci): add superpowers sync workflow
e5d2c93 🗑️ remove(skills): drop duplicate workflows
3ae9708 🐛 fix(ci): update tests for flag-only scripts
c44b9aa 🔧 chore(scripts): require flag-driven args
e4e1d14 🔧 chore(scripts): unify single-dash options
b2eb475  test(templates): add template coverage
fc230b7 🎨 style(markdown): format markdown files
8dc8924 🔧 chore(markdown): add prettier config and usage
2045dd4  feat(vendor_playbook): add apply-templates option
872d8cf  feat(templates): add sync templates scaffolding
5b1ca45 📝 docs(skills): clarify todo-plan template
054967a  feat(skills): add todo-plan skill
cc340f1 🔧 chore(ci): align standards-check workflow template
e9de0aa 🔧 chore(ci): drop removed skill check
e5dd7d9 🔧 fix(sync): avoid backtick expansion
087b0b9 🔧 chore(sync): align agents block across ps1/bat
9481510 🔧 chore(sync): scope agents block to existing langs
b0ca842 🔧 fix(sync): rewrite docs path in agents
c98d65c 🔧 chore(sync): rewrite agents docs paths
c33611c 🗑️ remove(skills): drop unused skills and update references
2b37860 🎨 style(markdown): format markdown files
e3ecd26 📝 docs(tsl): align syntax annotations and examples
37546fe 🐛 fix(playbook): enforce rulesets to agents flow
f2df89d 🐛 fix(scripts): include language list in AGENTS.md
c0d0737 🐛 fix(playbook): add agents mirror for sync
3b8b99b 🎨 style(markdown): normalize md headings and lists
31f3000 ♻️ refactor(playbook): rename agents template directory to rulesets
11b2bed  feat(markdown): add ruleset and sync support
5b89580  test(scripts): quiet git init warnings
5822a87 ♻️ refactor(playbook): streamline agents and refresh tsl docs

git-subtree-dir: docs/standards/playbook
git-subtree-split: a85453439f65b0c0aa05a5bbece773a02216ce76
This commit is contained in:
csh
2026-02-02 10:51:38 +08:00
parent ac794a6a70
commit b52102b7bd
192 changed files with 109197 additions and 135276 deletions
@@ -1,48 +1,139 @@
---
name: verification-before-completion
description:
"Evidence-based verification before claiming completion. Triggers: verify,
verification, run tests, prove, 验证, 跑一下, 确认一下, 自证."
description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
---
# Verification Before Completion(先验证再宣称完成)
# Verification Before Completion
## When to Use
## Overview
- Any task where correctness matters (bug fixes, refactors, releases)
- When the environment is complex or assumptions are likely
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
## Inputsrequired
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
- What “done” means (acceptance criteria)
- The smallest verification command(s) that prove it
- Constraints: cannot run tests? no access? limited environment?
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## Proceduredefault
## The Iron Law
1. **Define Success Signals**
- Tests passing, build artifacts produced, commands return 0
- Specific output text or file diffs
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
2. **Run the Smallest Check**
- Start narrow (changed module tests) then broaden if needed
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
3. **Record Evidence**
- Capture key output lines, exit codes, and relevant file paths
## The Gate Function
4. **Handle Gaps**
- If verification cant be run, say why and offer alternatives (manual
checklist, static reasoning, targeted logs)
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
## Output Contractstable
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
- What changed
- What was verified (exact commands)
- Evidence (exit codes / key outputs)
- What was not verified (and why)
- Next steps (if any)
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Guardrails
## Common Failures
- Dont claim “fixed” without a verification signal
- Prefer repeatable commands over subjective inspection
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```
**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```
**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```
## Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
## When To Apply
**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
## The Bottom Line
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.