📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots

2026-05-29 08:33:53 +00:00
parent fdb52f1e96
commit 06e0d13d57
1615 changed files with 232858 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+name: Bug Report
+about: Something the skill gets wrong — a missing finding, a false positive, or broken output
+labels: bug
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+## What happened
+
+<!-- Describe the incorrect behavior. What did brooks-lint do? What did you expect? -->
+
+## How to reproduce
+
+**Review mode:** <!-- PR Review / Architecture Audit / Tech Debt / Test Quality / Health Dashboard -->
+
+**Input (code snippet or description):**
+```
+<!-- paste the code or describe the scenario -->
+```
+
+**Brooks-lint output:**
+```
+<!-- paste the actual output -->
+```
+
+**Expected output:**
+<!-- Describe what a correct review should have flagged or said differently -->
+
+## Platform
+
+- [ ] Claude Code
+- [ ] Codex CLI
+- [ ] Gemini CLI
+
+## Version
+
+<!-- Paste the brooks-lint version (shown in the README badge, or run `/plugin list` in Claude Code). -->
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+name: Feature Request
+about: Suggest a new decay risk, a new review mode, or an improvement to the skill
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+## What problem does this solve?
+
+<!-- Describe the gap. What does brooks-lint miss or do poorly that this would fix? -->
+
+## Proposed change
+
+<!-- Which file(s) would need to change? Rough idea of what to add/modify. -->
+
+| File | Change |
+|------|--------|
+| `skills/_shared/common.md` | |
+| `skills/_shared/decay-risks.md` | |
+| `skills/_shared/test-decay-risks.md` | |
+| `skills/brooks-review/` | |
+| `skills/brooks-audit/` | |
+| `skills/brooks-debt/` | |
+| `skills/brooks-test/` | |
+| Other: | |
+
+## Book citation (if applicable)
+
+<!-- If this idea comes from one of the six books (or a book not yet covered), cite it here. -->
+
+## Would you be willing to contribute this?
+
+- [ ] Yes, I can open a PR
+- [ ] I'd need guidance
+- [ ] Just leaving the idea here
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+name: New Eval Scenario
+about: Propose a test case for the benchmark suite — no code required
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+## Scenario
+
+**Review mode:** <!-- PR Review / Architecture Audit / Tech Debt / Test Quality — Health Dashboard aggregates the other four and has no dedicated eval scenarios -->
+
+**Decay risk targeted:** <!-- R1 Cognitive Overload / R2 Change Propagation / R3 Knowledge Duplication / R4 Accidental Complexity / R5 Dependency Disorder / R6 Domain Model Distortion / T1-T6 for test risks -->
+
+## Input
+
+<!-- Describe the code scenario or paste a snippet. It doesn't need to be a real codebase — a minimal example is fine. -->
+
+```
+<!-- code or description -->
+```
+
+## Expected finding
+
+<!-- What should brooks-lint flag here? Describe the symptom, which book/principle it maps to, and the severity (🔴/🟡/🟢). -->
+
+## Why this matters
+
+<!-- One sentence: what real-world problem does this scenario represent? -->