📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots

2026-05-29 08:33:53 +00:00
parent fdb52f1e96
commit 06e0d13d57
1615 changed files with 232858 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+# Comparison Methods
+
+Structured approaches for evaluating and comparing options.
+
+## Feature Comparison Matrix
+
+Side-by-side feature comparison.
+
+### Structure
+
+```markdown
+| Feature | Option A | Option B | Option C |
+|---------|----------|----------|----------|
+| Criterion 1 | Value | Value | Value |
+| Criterion 2 | Value | Value | Value |
+| Criterion 3 | Value | Value | Value |
+```
+
+### Best Practices
+
+- Use consistent value types (all quantitative or all qualitative)
+- Include units for numeric values
+- Mark unknown/unavailable as "N/A" or "Unknown"
+- Highlight standout values (best in bold)
+- Keep to 5-8 most important criteria
+
+### Example
+
+```markdown
+| Capability | Express | Fastify | Hono |
+|------------|---------|---------|------|
+| Requests/sec | 15k | 30k | **60k** |
+| TypeScript | Plugin | Native | **Native** |
+| Bundle size | 500KB | 350KB | **14KB** |
+| Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
+```
+
+## Trade-off Analysis
+
+Deeper evaluation of strengths and weaknesses.
+
+### Per-Option Analysis
+
+For each option, document:
+
+**Strengths**:
+- What it does well
+- Unique advantages
+- Best use cases
+
+**Weaknesses**:
+- Limitations
+- Edge cases it handles poorly
+- Known issues
+
+**Use cases**:
+- When to choose this option
+- Ideal scenarios
+
+**Deal-breakers**:
+- When to definitely avoid
+- Hard constraints it violates
+
+### Template
+
+```markdown
+## Option: {Name}
+
+**Strengths**:
+- {Advantage 1} — {evidence/detail}
+- {Advantage 2} — {evidence/detail}
+
+**Weaknesses**:
+- {Limitation 1} — {impact}
+- {Limitation 2} — {impact}
+
+**Best for**:
+- {Use case 1}
+- {Use case 2}
+
+**Avoid when**:
+- {Constraint 1}
+- {Constraint 2}
+```
+
+## Weighted Decision Matrix
+
+Quantitative scoring for complex decisions.
+
+### Process
+
+1. **List criteria** — identify evaluation factors
+2. **Assign weights** — 1-5 importance scale
+3. **Score options** — 1-5 on each criterion
+4. **Calculate totals** — Sum(weight x score)
+5. **Interpret results** — highest total is recommended
+
+### Template
+
+```markdown
+| Criterion | Weight | Option A | Option B | Option C |
+|-----------|--------|----------|----------|----------|
+| Performance | 5 | 4 (20) | 5 (25) | 3 (15) |
+| Ease of use | 3 | 5 (15) | 3 (9) | 4 (12) |
+| Ecosystem | 4 | 5 (20) | 3 (12) | 2 (8) |
+| Cost | 2 | 3 (6) | 4 (8) | 5 (10) |
+| **Total** | | **61** | **54** | **45** |
+```
+
+### Weight Guidelines
+
+| Weight | Meaning |
+|--------|---------|
+| 5 | Critical — must have |
+| 4 | Important — strong preference |
+| 3 | Moderate — nice to have |
+| 2 | Minor — slight preference |
+| 1 | Low — barely factors in |
+
+### Score Guidelines
+
+| Score | Meaning |
+|-------|---------|
+| 5 | Excellent — best in class |
+| 4 | Good — above average |
+| 3 | Adequate — meets needs |
+| 2 | Poor — below expectations |
+| 1 | Failing — does not meet need |
+
+## Pros/Cons List
+
+Simple qualitative comparison.
+
+### Structure
+
+```markdown
+## Option: {Name}
+
+### Pros
+- {Benefit 1}
+- {Benefit 2}
+
+### Cons
+- {Drawback 1}
+- {Drawback 2}
+
+### Verdict
+{Summary recommendation}
+```
+
+### When to Use
+
+- Quick informal comparisons
+- Binary decisions (2 options)
+- Early-stage exploration
+- When quantification isn't meaningful
+
+## Decision Criteria Framework
+
+Structured approach for defining what matters.
+
+### Categories
+
+**Functional Requirements**:
+- Features needed
+- Capabilities required
+- Integration points
+
+**Non-Functional Requirements**:
+- Performance benchmarks
+- Scalability needs
+- Security requirements
+
+**Operational Concerns**:
+- Maintenance burden
+- Monitoring/observability
+- Deployment complexity
+
+**Business Factors**:
+- Cost (license, infrastructure)
+- Vendor lock-in risk
+- Team expertise
+
+### Prioritization
+
+Categorize criteria:
+
+| Priority | Meaning | Impact on Decision |
+|----------|---------|-------------------|
+| Must-have | Non-negotiable | Eliminates options |
+| Should-have | Strong preference | Heavy weighting |
+| Nice-to-have | Bonus features | Light weighting |
+
+## Method Selection Guide
+
+| Situation | Recommended Method |
+|-----------|-------------------|
+| Quick comparison | Feature matrix |
+| Complex decision | Weighted matrix |
+| Stakeholder alignment | Trade-off analysis |
+| Binary choice | Pros/cons list |
+| Requirements gathering | Criteria framework |