📦 deps(thirdparty): update snapshots

2026-05-29 08:33:53 +00:00
parent fdb52f1e96
commit 06e0d13d57
1615 changed files with 232858 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+# Findings Report Template
+
+Standard structure for presenting research findings.
+
+## Full Report Template
+
+```markdown
+## Research Summary
+
+{ 1-2 sentence answer to research question }
+
+## Key Findings
+
+1. **{FINDING}** — evidence: {SOURCE}
+2. **{FINDING}** — evidence: {SOURCE}
+3. **{FINDING}** — evidence: {SOURCE}
+
+## Comparison (if applicable)
+
+| Criterion | Option A | Option B | Option C |
+|-----------|----------|----------|----------|
+| { criterion } | { value } | { value } | { value } |
+
+## Recommendation
+
+### Primary: {Option Name}
+
+**Rationale**: { detailed reasoning with evidence }
+
+**Confidence**: {HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW} — { explanation }
+
+### Alternatives
+
+- **{Option B}** — choose when { condition }
+- **{Option C}** — choose when { condition }
+
+## Confidence Assessment
+
+Overall: {BAR} {PERCENTAGE}%
+
+**High confidence areas**:
+- { area } — { reason }
+
+**Lower confidence areas**:
+- { area } — { reason }
+
+## Sources
+
+- [Source 1](url) — tier {N}, { brief description }
+- [Source 2](url) — tier {N}, { brief description }
+- [Source 3](url) — tier {N}, { brief description }
+
+## Caveats
+
+- { uncertainty or limitation }
+- { assumption made }
+- { gap in research }
+```
+
+## Compact Report Template
+
+For smaller findings or sub-reports.
+
+```markdown
+## {Topic}
+
+**Finding**: { main conclusion }
+
+**Evidence**:
+- { source 1 }: { key point }
+- { source 2 }: { key point }
+
+**Confidence**: { level } — { brief rationale }
+
+{ caveat if applicable }
+```
+
+## Section Guidelines
+
+### Research Summary
+
+- Lead with the answer
+- 1-2 sentences maximum
+- Make it actionable
+
+**Good**: "Use Hono for new API projects; it offers 4x better performance than Express with TypeScript-first design."
+
+**Bad**: "This report examines various web frameworks and their characteristics."
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- Number findings for reference
+- Each finding = one clear statement
+- Always cite source
+- Order by importance or logical flow
+
+### Comparison
+
+- Use feature matrix for side-by-side
+- Highlight standout values
+- Include only decision-relevant criteria
+- See [comparison-methods.md](comparison-methods.md)
+
+### Recommendation
+
+- State primary recommendation clearly
+- Explain why (rationale with evidence)
+- Include confidence level
+- Provide alternatives with conditions
+
+### Confidence Assessment
+
+Use visual confidence bars:
+
+```
+High:     (90-100%)
+Moderate: (60-89%)
+Low:      (below 60%)
+```
+
+Explain what drives confidence up or down.
+
+### Sources
+
+- List all cited sources
+- Include tier assessment
+- Provide direct links
+- See [source-tiers.md](source-tiers.md)
+
+### Caveats
+
+Include when:
+- Research has gaps
+- Sources conflict
+- Time constraints limited depth
+- Findings are context-dependent
+
+Use indicator for visibility.
+
+## Formatting Conventions
+
+### Emphasis
+
+- **Bold** for key terms and findings
+- `code` for technical terms
+- Links for sources
+
+### Visual Indicators
+
+- `HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW` — confidence levels
+- Progress bars for visual confidence
+- — caveats and warnings
+- Tables for comparisons
+
+### Citations
+
+Inline: `[Source Name](url)`
+Reference style: See Sources section at end
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before delivering findings:
+
+- [ ] Summary answers the question directly
+- [ ] All findings have source citations
+- [ ] Confidence level stated with rationale
+- [ ] Caveats section present if uncertainty exists
+- [ ] Sources include tier assessment
+- [ ] Recommendation is actionable
+- [ ] Alternatives provided with conditions