playbook/antigravity-awesome-skills/plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-.../skills/yao-meta-skill/references/qa-ladder.md

58 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

# QA Ladder
Use the smallest quality gate set that still protects the user from likely failure.
## Basic
Use when:
- the skill is disposable or exploratory
- the route is obvious
- there is little downside to imperfect output
Recommended checks:
- structure sanity
- naming alignment
- a quick read for boundary clarity
## Standard
Use when:
- the skill will be reused
- near-neighbor prompts are plausible
- references or scripts could drift from the main instructions
Recommended checks:
- `validate_skill.py`
- `resource_boundary_check.py`
- a small trigger prompt set
- one description optimization pass when route wording is still unstable
- one realistic output example
## Advanced
Use when:
- the skill is shared infrastructure
- packaging or routing errors would be costly
- you want evidence that the skill stays healthy over time
Recommended checks:
- description optimization suite with dev and holdout cases
- family-based trigger regression
- failure and anti-pattern regression
- governance scoring
- packaging contract validation
- regression history and result reporting
## Escalation Heuristics
- add trigger eval before writing more instruction detail
- add boundary checks before adding more folders
- add governance and history once the skill becomes a maintained asset
- do not add advanced checks only for optics